The
|
|
|||
|
The one great certainty for everyone is death. Yet how many of us
consider - let alone prepare for - this major trauma? DAVID CHRISTIE-MURRAY
discusses reasons for believing in an afterlife
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE DIE? Nothing? Complete bliss - 'eternal life'? Or a vague, insubstantial something? Materialists and atheists would answer 'nothing'. For them life is a purely biological process, when the body dies the personality dies with it, just as electricity stops being generated when a battery fails. To such people life cannot 'go somewhere else'. These rationalists frequently point out that the age-old belief in an afterlife is merely a reflection of Man's terror of death, of personal oblivion. Throughout history he has either avoided the unthinkable or surrounded it with ritual and a childish optimism. The materialist believes this to be craven and intellectually dishonest - we ought to face 'the facts' - after all, it is true to say that the one fact of life is death. What of the concept of 'eternal life'? Nearly all religionists have preached that we survive.bodily death - in one form or another. It is probably true to say that the more sophisticated the religion, the more certainly it envisages some form of 'life everlasting' for some deathless element of the individual, whether in a kind of paradise or amid the torments of hell. If the materialist is correct, no further enquiry need be made. If the religionists are correct, then it surely behoves each individual to look to his or her salvation. But in the context of religion, belief in the afterlife must remain a matter of faith, and only the experience of our own death can prove us right or wrong.
But what if neither of these rigid concepts is correct? What if something - some lifespark, vestige of the human personality -survives and enters a new kind of existence, not as a form of reward or punishment, but merely obeying a natural law? Today many psychical researchers feel that the balance of evidence suggests that 'something' does survive, not neccessarily for very long after death, nor necessarily the whole personality. According to them, parts of an individual's memory-system and personality traits sometimes seem to survive for a time, enabling his disembodied self to be recognised by the living who knew him, but later perhaps to disintegrate forever. The objective analysis of purported evidence for human survival is a major concern of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR), founded in London in 1882. But the foundmg of the SPR would probably never have happened but for events of a generation earlier, which themselves might never have happened but for the emancipation of Man's thought that began in the Renaissance.
Closed minds, closed ranks In the light of such hard rationalism, a faith with results that could be demonstrated was sought after. So when poltergeist activity occurred at the Fox family home in Hydesville, New York, in 1848 (see page 293) the public was tremendously excited. Here at last was 'proof' of the survival of the spirit; an antidote to the bleakness of materialism. Spiritualism was born and has become a significant movement in the western world.
Spiritualists believe that their faith demonstrates incontrovertibly the existence of a life after death. They point to seances where, it is said, spirits move heavy tables, play musical instruments and introduce apports; where dead relatives and friends speak recognisably in their own voices of events known only to themselves and one or more of the sitters, and sometimes even materialise in their own appearances before them. But scientists refused to investivate seance-room phenomena, while Spiritualists - and fundamentalist Christians - took refuge though not as allies) in simple faith that regarded scientific discoveries as due to Devil-inspired cleverness. It was in this climate of extremes that the SPR was founded. The founder members were a group of British intellectuals who objected to the entrenched positions of 'believers' and 'sceptics' and who felt that the objective assessment of unusual phenomena was long overdue. The material collected by the British SPR and similar societies in other countries provides the strongest clues for the serious enquirer into the question 'What happens when we die?' The huge body of material collected since 1882 may be categorised as follows: phantasms; communications through mediums; cross-correspondences; 'drop-in' communicators; 'welcoming' phantasms seen by the dying; experiences of patients during 'clinical death'; out-of-the-body experiences; cipher and combination lock tests; appearance pacts; evidence for reincarnation; electronic voice phenomena.
Phantasms Most parapsychologists who accept the evidence of phantasms at all agree that thought transference - which includes thoughts, feelings, and images both visual and auditory, and would today be classified as extra-sensory perception (ESP) - is a faculty of some human minds and could be used to explain phantasms of the living. It also seems to be confirmed by some individuals' claims that they 'think' themselves into paying 'astral visits' - travelling while out-of-the-body - to acquaintances. The claimants not only 'see' the rooms into which they project themselves mentally but report accurately such features as changes of furniture, of which their conscious selves were ignorant. Furthermore, they are often seen by the friends thev 'visit' and are sometimes also accurately described by strangers. However, some 6 or 7 per cent of the apparitions recorded in the SPR survey appeared too long after death for them to be explained as delayed telepathic communications. This small number of cases remained after all other explanations - hoaxing, exaggeration, mistaken identity, dreaming and so on - had been examined and found inadequate. The cases that were classified as genuine apparitions or phantasms of the dead showed certain common features. In some, the apparition conveyed information previously unknown to the percipient. In others it showed a clearly defined purpose. In yet others it resembled a dead person unknown to the percipient who later recognised him from a portrait or photograph, or from some characteristic of the deceased unknown to him at the time. Sometimes different people at different times - independently of each other - saw the same apparition. Some psychical researchers think that only those cases in which the apparitions indicate a specific purpose for their manifestation can be taken as significant evidence of survival and even then perhaps only as evidence of temporary survival. It could well be that, as a memory survives the event remembered, so a thought or anxiety to communicate something urgently to the living might continue to exist after the thinker's death until its purpose was fulfilled; then it, too, might die. Since the early days of the SPR many astute minds have studied and recorded evidence of survival provided by such apparitions. Some have believed that we live on, others not. It is safe to say that none of the researchers involved has been convinced of survival on the evidence of apparitions alone.
Communications through mediums A 'mental' sensitive may go into a trance, in which a 'control' ('controlling spirit' or 'spirit guide') speaks through her, frequently in a voice entirely different from her own, and occasionally even giving her a different appearance, so that a European woman may temporarily take on the likeness and voice of say, a Chinese man. Through the sensitive the control may introduce other alleged spirits, recognisable by voice, gesture, or the nature of the private information they give to one of the sitters at the seance. Such so-called spirits may seem extremely convincing, though it must he said that those who want to believe will believe anyway. However, sensitives often have striking gifts of clairaudience, clairvoyance and other qualities of ESP. Sometimes they will communicate through the planchette board, like 'Patience Worth' (see page 406), or through automatic script (see page 438), or draw in the style of recognised masters (see page 390) or compose in the manner of famous musicians (see page 350). Another type of sensitive is the 'direct voice' medium, who does not, as a rule, go into a trance and from whose vicinity voices of both sexes and different kinds speak in various accents, and sometimes other identifiable languages.
Communications from these sources vary enormously in quality. Much of it is trivial and curiously materialistic. It was a frequent gibe in the early days of Spiritualism that spirits seemed to spend their afterlife smoking cigars and drinking whisky. Yet this, and other similar 'materialistic' evidence would support the teachings of some Eastern religions that an early stage after death involves passing through a realm of illusion where the ego may indulge in anything and everything it wants.
Other communications, however, are of high ethical and literary standard. Yet frequently when challenged to give an unequivocal description of what awaits us on the other side of life, communicators reply perhap not unreasonably that the spirit existence is indescribable. But some rare spirits are more forthcoming, and an uncannily consistent picture of the afterlife emerges through their communications.
'Physical' mediums are those in whose presence, whether they go into trances or not, physical phenomena occur. These may include loud raps from the seance table or from various points around the room; sometimes they seem to be in an intelligent code as if trying to convey some message. Also common are telekinetic phenomena (solid objects moving as if handled by an invisible person); levitation, of the sensitive and of objects; the playing of musical instruments by unseen hands, and actual materialisation of spirit forms. Sadly, in the short history of Spiritualism, many of these phenomena have been faked, but there still remain many cases of genuine physical mediumship that defy 'rational' explanation. Many tests have been set up to try to trap the frauds, and, to a lesser extent, to determine the extent of the phenomena. One such was the provision of a dish of warm wax at a physical seance; the materialised 'spirit' hand dipped itself into the wax, which rapidly set. The hand dematerialised, leaving the mould unbroken. But even such demonstrations of paranormal effects do not prove survival of death in themselves. The material accumulated by the SPR contains, so many researchers believe, far stronger evidence. Is it true that nobody has ever come back from the afterlife? See page 730
|
Reproduced from THE UNEXPLAINED p681